Loading the page …

Stockfish at the start of the endgame

Emanuel Lasker in the endgame.

492 endgames of Emanuel Lasker, each evaluated by Stockfish at its start. 216 began equal – they brought 58.1 % of the points and 61 wins.

All endgames of Emanuel Lasker →

How it began – and how it ended

Every endgame of Emanuel Lasker by the value Stockfish gives its start – from the side of Emanuel Lasker –, and what became of it.

  1. Clearly worse (−1.5 and less) 81 · 10.5 %
  2. Slightly worse 9 · 27.8 %
  3. Equal (±0.5) 216 · 58.1 %
  4. Slightly better 23 · 93.5 %
  5. Clearly better (+1.5 and more) 163 · 94.5 %

won drawn lost

By endgame family

Rook and minor piece25764.8 %33
Queen and piece15559 %15
Rook endgames4175.6 %8
Minor pieces3959 %5

Emanuel Lasker against World champions

Points per endgame family – the family the endgame began in. Only families with at least ten endgames.

Rook endgames41 games 75.6% 61.9%
Queen and piece157 games 59.6% 63.5%

Emanuel LaskerWorld champions

A click on a row shows only the positions of Emanuel Lasker from these endgames in the trainer.

By time control

The same endgames, split into classical, rapid and blitz games – each beside the own group.

Classical494 games 63.6% 63.8%

Emanuel LaskerWorld champions

chessophia recognizes the time control by the name of the event (“Blitz”, “Rapid” …); all other games count as classical.

Won from equality 61

61 endgames Emanuel Lasker began without an advantage – Stockfish saw at most half a pawn for either side – and won them all the same. Here the 24 with the lowest starting value.

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: −0.45 – White: Ke3, Rf1, Bd3, c2, a3, h3, c4, e4, g4, d5; Black: Kg7, Rf8, Nc5, e5, b6, g6, h6, a7, c7, f78a7b6c5d4e3f2g1h

−0.45 → won

Emanuel Lasker – Siegbert Tarrasch
Berlin m2 1916 · Rook and bishop vs. rook and knight

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: −0.25 – White: Kg1, Rf1, a2, c2, g2, c3, h3, d4, e5; Black: Kg7, Rf4, Be6, Ne7, d5, h6, a7, b7, c71h2g3f4e5d6c7b8a

−0.25 → won

L. McCudden – Emanuel Lasker
New York sim 1928 · Rook, bishop and knight vs. rook

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: −0.22 – White: Kf1, Bd2, Ne1, a2, b2, f2, g2, h2, d4; Black: Kg8, Bd6, Nb6, c6, f6, a7, b7, g7, h78a7b6c5d4e3f2g1h

−0.22 → won

Emanuel Lasker – Max Euwe
Nottingham 1936 · Bishop and knight vs. bishop and knight

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: −0.2 – White: Kf2, Ra5, Be3, a2, h2, g4, c5; Black: Kf7, Rc6, Bd3, d5, g5, a6, f6, h78a7b6c5d4e3f2g1h

−0.2 → won

Emanuel Lasker – Szavay
HUN tour sim 1917 · Rook and bishop vs. rook and bishop

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: −0.19 – White: Kh2, Rc2, Bh6, g2, a3, e3, g3, b4; Black: Kg8, Re5, Be2, e4, d5, b6, a7, h71h2g3f4e5d6c7b8a

−0.19 → won

Josef Emil Krejcik – Emanuel Lasker
GER tour sim 1908 · Rook and bishop vs. rook and bishop

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: −0.16 – White: Kc1, Rd2, Bg3, b2, g2, h2, a3; Black: Kg8, Rc8, Ne6, d4, c5, g6, g71h2g3f4e5d6c7b8a

−0.16 → won

Frederick Yates – Emanuel Lasker
New York 1924 · Rook and bishop vs. rook and knight

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: −0.12 – White: Kg1, Rc6, Nf3, f2, h5, g6; Black: Kh8, Rb8, Bb2, b6, h6, g71h2g3f4e5d6c7b8a

−0.12 → won

Stefano Rosselli del Turco – Emanuel Lasker
Zuerich 1934 · Rook and bishop vs. rook and knight

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: −0.02 – White: Kh2, Nd1, Nc5, b2, b3, g3, h3, f4; Black: Kg8, Bb7, Ng6, a5, e6, f7, g7, h78a7b6c5d4e3f2g1h

−0.02 → won

Emanuel Lasker – Georg Marco
Paris 1900 · Bishop and knight vs. two knights

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: −0.01 – White: Kf2, Rd4, Ne4, b2, c2, g2, h2, f3, b5; Black: Kb7, Ra8, Be6, b6, h6, a7, c7, f7, g71h2g3f4e5d6c7b8a

−0.01 → won

David Graham Baird – Emanuel Lasker
New York sim 1892 · Rook and bishop vs. rook and knight

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: 0.0 – White: Kg1, Qa3, Re3, a2, f2, g2, h2, c4, d5; Black: Kf7, Qd7, Ra8, c5, d6, f6, a7, g7, h78a7b6c5d4e3f2g1h

0.0 → won

Emanuel Lasker – T. Scheve
Berlin sim 1891 · Queen and rook vs. queen and rook

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: 0.0 – White: Kf3, Rd6, Bb3, c2, g2, h3; Black: Kf6, Ra7, Rb8, g3, f5, g61h2g3f4e5d6c7b8a

0.0 → won

Hermann G. Voigt – Emanuel Lasker
Philadelphia sim 1892 · Two rooks vs. rook and bishop

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: 0.0 – White: Kh1, Qg6, Ne6, b2, a3, c3, e3, h3, d4, f4; Black: Kh8, Rf8, Be8, a4, c4, e4, b5, f5, h68a7b6c5d4e3f2g1h

0.0 → won

Emanuel Lasker – Gustavus Charles Reichhelm
Philadelphia sim 1892 · Queen and knight vs. rook and bishop

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: 0.0 – White: Kg1, Re4, Nf3, a2, f2, g2, h3, c5, d5; Black: Kg8, Rf8, Ba5, h6, a7, b7, c7, g78a7b6c5d4e3f2g1h

0.0 → won

Emanuel Lasker – H. Helms
USA tour sim 1893 · Rook and bishop vs. rook and knight

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: 0.0 – White: Kg3, Qb1, Be3, b2, d3, f3, c4, g4, f5; Black: Kg8, Qd7, Bf8, c5, e5, g5, b6, c6, f68a7b6c5d4e3f2g1h

0.0 → won

Emanuel Lasker – Harry Nelson Pillsbury
New York 1893 · Queen and bishop vs. queen and bishop

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: 0.0 – White: Kf3, Rh1, Nf4, a2, b2; Black: Kg8, Re1, Rd2, a7, b7, f7, g78a7b6c5d4e3f2g1h

0.0 → won

Emanuel Lasker – D. C. Golmayo
Havana m1 1893 · Two rooks vs. rook and knight

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: 0.0 – White: Kg1, Re1, Bf3, a2, f4, h4, b7; Black: Kf7, Rd4, Nf5, e3, a5, e6, g71h2g3f4e5d6c7b8a

0.0 → won

Wilhelm Steinitz – Emanuel Lasker
World Championship 05th 1894 · Rook and bishop vs. rook and knight

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: 0.0 – White: Kg1, Qe2, Rb1, a2, c2, g2, h2, b3, e4; Black: Kg8, Qf4, Rb8, c5, d6, e6, g6, a7, c7, h78a7b6c5d4e3f2g1h

0.0 → won

Emanuel Lasker – Harry Nelson Pillsbury
Hastings 1895 · Queen and rook vs. queen and rook

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: 0.0 – White: Kg2, Qg4, Nf3, f2, h2, g3, a4, b4, d4, e5; Black: Kg8, Qa6, Nc7, d5, b6, e6, h6, a7, f7, g78a7b6c5d4e3f2g1h

0.0 → won

Emanuel Lasker – Mikhail Chigorin
Nuremberg 1896 · Queen and knight vs. queen and knight

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: 0.0 – White: Kh2, Ra7, Nd5, b2, f2, f4; Black: Kc8, Re8, Bf5, f3, b6, f6, g7, h78a7b6c5d4e3f2g1h

0.0 → won

Emanuel Lasker – Emanuel Schiffers
Nuremberg 1896 · Rook and bishop vs. rook and knight

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: 0.0 – White: Kf2, Re7, Ne2, a2, b2, f3, h3, d4, g4, f5; Black: Kf8, Bc7, Nh4, d5, a6, c6, b78a7b6c5d4e3f2g1h

0.0 → won

Emanuel Lasker – Dawid Janowski
London 1899 · Rook and knight vs. bishop and knight

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: 0.0 – White: Kg1, Rf4, Rd6, a2, c2, g2, h2, c3, e4; Black: Kg7, Ra8, Rf8, c6, e6, f6, g6, a7, b78a7b6c5d4e3f2g1h

0.0 → won

Emanuel Lasker – Bobrov
Moscow sim 1899 · Two rooks vs. two rooks

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: 0.0 – White: Kg1, Rf3, Bd3, a2, b2, c3, h3, d4, e5; Black: Kg7, Rc7, Nh5, d5, e6, g6, a7, b7, h71h2g3f4e5d6c7b8a

0.0 → won

Jackson Showalter – Emanuel Lasker
London 1899 · Rook and bishop vs. rook and knight

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: 0.0 – White: Ke1, Qg8, a2, b2, f2, c3; Black: Ke5, Qg5, Rf4, Bb6, c4, e4, a6, d6, c71h2g3f4e5d6c7b8a

0.0 → won

Walter Penn Shipley – Emanuel Lasker
USA tour sim 1902 · Queen, rook and bishop vs. queen

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: 0.0 – White: Kg1, Ra1, Ng8, a2, b2, c3, g3, d4, g5; Black: Kc8, Rf7, Bf3, a6, d6, b7, c7, h78a7b6c5d4e3f2g1h

0.0 → won

Emanuel Lasker – NN
USA tour sim 1902 · Rook and bishop vs. rook and knight

Saved 17

17 endgames Emanuel Lasker held or won although Stockfish saw a disadvantage of at least one and a half pawns at the start. The 12 with the worst value.

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: −9.09 – White: Kd2, Rf6, Ne3, a2, b4; Black: Kd7, Qa1, Ng4, e4, a6, c68a7b6c5d4e3f2g1h

−9.09 → drawn

Emanuel Lasker – J. H. Sweeney
USA tour sim 1893 · Queen and knight vs. rook and knight

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: −7.03 – White: Kc2, Qb8, Rd3, b2, a3, c4, h4, e6; Black: Kf6, Qh5, Ng2, a4, d4, c5, f5, g6, h78a7b6c5d4e3f2g1h

−7.03 → drawn

Emanuel Lasker – Samuel Lipschuetz
USA tour sim 1901 · Queen and rook vs. queen and knight

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: −5.86 – White: Kf1, Rc1, Nf3, a2, f2, h2, g3, c4; Black: Kc8, Rg4, Rg8, c3, e5, f5, b6, a7, c7, h78a7b6c5d4e3f2g1h

−5.86 → drawn

Emanuel Lasker – Lukenbach
New York sim 1892 · Two rooks vs. rook and knight

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: −5.37 – White: Kg1, Qe2, Nc5, a2, b2, f2, h2, c3, d4, h4; Black: Kh7, Qh3, Rg6, d5, g5, a7, c7, f7, g78a7b6c5d4e3f2g1h

−5.37 → drawn

Emanuel Lasker – Joseph Henry Blackburne
London m 1892 · Queen and rook vs. queen and knight

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: −4.81 – White: Kd2, Rh7, Nd3, a3, b5, e5, g5; Black: Ke7, Rc8, Be6, d5, b6, g6, a7, f78a7b6c5d4e3f2g1h

−4.81 → drawn

Emanuel Lasker – William Harold Hughes
Philadelphia sim 1907 · Rook and bishop vs. rook and knight

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: −4.78 – White: Ke3, Rd3, Bc2, g2, a3, h3, f4, e5; Black: Kc7, Rb7, Be6, a5, d5, f5, g6, h71h2g3f4e5d6c7b8a

−4.78 → drawn

Julius Finn – Emanuel Lasker
USA tour sim 1901 · Rook and bishop vs. rook and bishop

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: −4.06 – White: Kh1, Qe2, Rg3, a2, b3, d3, c4, e4; Black: Kh8, Rg8, Bd4, c5, a6, c6, d6, h71h2g3f4e5d6c7b8a

−4.06 → drawn

Joseph Henry Blackburne – Emanuel Lasker
London m 1892 · Queen and rook vs. rook and bishop

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: −3.95 – White: Kg1, Re4, Bc3, a2, b2, g2, d4, c5; Black: Ke7, Rg7, Rd8, h5, e6, a7, b78a7b6c5d4e3f2g1h

−3.95 → drawn

Emanuel Lasker – R. Sauter
Budapest sim 1900 · Two rooks vs. rook and bishop

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: −3.84 – White: Kf2, Ra1, Bc1, a2, b2, g2, c4, d4, d5; Black: Ke8, Ra8, Bd7, f3, g4, f6, a7, b7, c7, h78a7b6c5d4e3f2g1h

−3.84 → drawn

Emanuel Lasker – Rudolf Raubitschek
Trenton Falls 1906 · Rook and bishop vs. rook and bishop

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: −3.62 – White: Kg1, Qh6, Re1, a2, b2, c2, f2, g2, h3; Black: Kg8, Qd7, Ra8, c5, f5, d6, e6, a7, c7, h71h2g3f4e5d6c7b8a

−3.62 → drawn

Ossip Bernstein – Emanuel Lasker
St Petersburg 1909 · Queen and rook vs. queen and rook

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: −3.32 – White: Kh2, Qc2, Nc1, f2, g2, b3, c3, e3, g3; Black: Kg8, Qf6, Nd6, b5, d5, c6, h6, f7, g78a7b6c5d4e3f2g1h

−3.32 → drawn

Emanuel Lasker – Georgy Lisitsin
Moscow 1935 · Queen and knight vs. queen and knight

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: −2.84 – White: Kf1, Rb1, Nd4, f2, g2, h2, a5; Black: Ka4, Ra8, Be6, d5, f7, h71h2g3f4e5d6c7b8a

−2.84 → drawn

Rudolf Spielmann – Emanuel Lasker
Moscow 1935 · Rook and bishop vs. rook and knight

Let slip 15

15 endgames Emanuel Lasker began at least one and a half pawns up – and did not win. That belongs to it too: the 12 with the highest value.

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: +8.99 – White: Kg2, Qe3, Re7, f2, h2, a3, f3, d4, d5; Black: Kg8, Qb1, Ra6, a5, d6, g6, c7, f7, h78a7b6c5d4e3f2g1h

+8.99 → drawn

Emanuel Lasker – J. L. Sherman
USA sim 1926 · Queen and rook vs. queen and rook

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: +6.79 – White: Kg1, Qf2, Rf4, g2, h2, g6; Black: Kg8, Qc2, Rc8, b5, d5, a6, b7, g7, h78a7b6c5d4e3f2g1h

+6.79 → lost

Emanuel Lasker – R. J. Loman
USA tour sim 1903 · Queen and rook vs. queen and rook

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: +6.47 – White: Kg1, Nb4, Nd4, a2, b2, g2, h2, c3, f5; Black: Kg8, Qe2, Nc5, d5, c6, a7, f7, g7, h78a7b6c5d4e3f2g1h

+6.47 → drawn

Emanuel Lasker – NN
GBR tour sim 1900 · Queen and knight vs. two knights

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: +6.45 – White: Kf4, Ra1, Bd3, a2, b3, d4, c5, g5; Black: Kh8, Ra8, Rc8, f3, c6, a7, b7, h71h2g3f4e5d6c7b8a

+6.45 → drawn

John Finan Barry – Emanuel Lasker
New York sim 1904 · Two rooks vs. rook and bishop

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: +6.32 – White: Kf1, Rh1, Nd3, f2, b4, h5; Black: Kh8, Qe3, Re8, f3, a6, f6, h78a7b6c5d4e3f2g1h

+6.32 → drawn

Emanuel Lasker – Jacques Mieses
Leipzig m 8990 1889 · Queen and rook vs. rook and knight

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: +5.84 – White: Kh2, Rd1, Bf6, b2, a3, h3, f4; Black: Kh8, Rf7, Bg7, d2, c4, b5, a6, h61h2g3f4e5d6c7b8a

+5.84 → drawn

Carl Schlechter – Emanuel Lasker
St Petersburg 1909 · Rook and bishop vs. rook and bishop

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: +5.42 – White: Kd2, Rf1, Nc3, a3, b3, e3, h4, d5; Black: Kd7, Rg3, Nb8, e4, c5, f5, h5, d6, a78a7b6c5d4e3f2g1h

+5.42 → drawn

Emanuel Lasker – Henry Bird
Liverpool m 1890 · Rook and knight vs. rook and knight

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: +4.51 – White: Kg1, Re2, Rd5, a2, f2, h2, a4, e4, f4; Black: Ke8, Rb8, Ne6, d6, c7, f7, g7, h71h2g3f4e5d6c7b8a

+4.51 → drawn

Julio Lynch – Emanuel Lasker
Buenos Aires sim 1910 · Two rooks vs. rook and knight

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: +3.76 – White: Kg1, Rc1, Rd2, a2, f2, h2, g3, d6; Black: Kb8, Ra4, Rd8, e5, c6, f6, a7, f7, h78a7b6c5d4e3f2g1h

+3.76 → drawn

Emanuel Lasker – Walter Penn Shipley
New York sim 1911 · Two rooks vs. two rooks

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: +3.14 – White: Kf1, Qh6, Nd3, b2, f2, g2, h2, a4, b4; Black: Kd8, Qh4, Rg8, d5, h5, a6, d6, e68a7b6c5d4e3f2g1h

+3.14 → lost

Emanuel Lasker – Hanni
SUI tour sim 1898 · Queen and rook vs. queen and knight

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: +3.03 – White: Kc3, Rh6, Bd3, e3, a4, b4, c5, e5; Black: Kb7, Rh8, Bf7, d5, h5, a6, c6, e6, h78a7b6c5d4e3f2g1h

+3.03 → drawn

Emanuel Lasker – Fedor Parfenovich Bohatirchuk
Moscow 1935 · Rook and bishop vs. rook and bishop

Start of the endgame, value for Emanuel Lasker: +2.43 – White: Kd2, Rc2, Nb3, f2, h2, a3, e3, g3, d4; Black: Kd6, Rc8, Nd5, b5, f5, g5, a6, e6, h61h2g3f4e5d6c7b8a

+2.43 → drawn

Ilia Abramovich Kan – Emanuel Lasker
Moscow 1936 · Rook and knight vs. rook and knight

How it was measured

For each of the 497 endgames Stockfish 19 evaluated the position in which the game became an endgame – at depth 24, with a time limit; a measurement that missed the depth does not count. The values are pawns from the player's side: an evaluation, not a verdict like that of the tablebase. When a game counts as an endgame is told on the page Database.

Measurements as of 14 November 2026.