−0.45 → won
Emanuel Lasker – Siegbert Tarrasch
Berlin m2 1916 · Rook and bishop vs. rook and knight
Stockfish at the start of the endgame
492 endgames of Emanuel Lasker, each evaluated by Stockfish at its start. 216 began equal – they brought 58.1 % of the points and 61 wins.
All endgames of Emanuel Lasker →
Every endgame of Emanuel Lasker by the value Stockfish gives its start – from the side of Emanuel Lasker –, and what became of it.
won drawn lost
| Rook and minor piece | 257 | 64.8 % | 33 |
| Queen and piece | 155 | 59 % | 15 |
| Rook endgames | 41 | 75.6 % | 8 |
| Minor pieces | 39 | 59 % | 5 |
Points per endgame family – the family the endgame began in. Only families with at least ten endgames.
Emanuel LaskerWorld champions
A click on a row shows only the positions of Emanuel Lasker from these endgames in the trainer.
The same endgames, split into classical, rapid and blitz games – each beside the own group.
chessophia recognizes the time control by the name of the event (“Blitz”, “Rapid” …); all other games count as classical.
Choose a second player: that player's points then stand beside those of Emanuel Lasker.
61 endgames Emanuel Lasker began without an advantage – Stockfish saw at most half a pawn for either side – and won them all the same. Here the 24 with the lowest starting value.
−0.45 → won
Emanuel Lasker – Siegbert Tarrasch
Berlin m2 1916 · Rook and bishop vs. rook and knight
−0.25 → won
L. McCudden – Emanuel Lasker
New York sim 1928 · Rook, bishop and knight vs. rook
−0.22 → won
Emanuel Lasker – Max Euwe
Nottingham 1936 · Bishop and knight vs. bishop and knight
−0.2 → won
Emanuel Lasker – Szavay
HUN tour sim 1917 · Rook and bishop vs. rook and bishop
−0.19 → won
Josef Emil Krejcik – Emanuel Lasker
GER tour sim 1908 · Rook and bishop vs. rook and bishop
−0.16 → won
Frederick Yates – Emanuel Lasker
New York 1924 · Rook and bishop vs. rook and knight
−0.12 → won
Stefano Rosselli del Turco – Emanuel Lasker
Zuerich 1934 · Rook and bishop vs. rook and knight
−0.02 → won
Emanuel Lasker – Georg Marco
Paris 1900 · Bishop and knight vs. two knights
−0.01 → won
David Graham Baird – Emanuel Lasker
New York sim 1892 · Rook and bishop vs. rook and knight
0.0 → won
Emanuel Lasker – T. Scheve
Berlin sim 1891 · Queen and rook vs. queen and rook
0.0 → won
Hermann G. Voigt – Emanuel Lasker
Philadelphia sim 1892 · Two rooks vs. rook and bishop
0.0 → won
Emanuel Lasker – Gustavus Charles Reichhelm
Philadelphia sim 1892 · Queen and knight vs. rook and bishop
0.0 → won
Emanuel Lasker – H. Helms
USA tour sim 1893 · Rook and bishop vs. rook and knight
0.0 → won
Emanuel Lasker – Harry Nelson Pillsbury
New York 1893 · Queen and bishop vs. queen and bishop
0.0 → won
Emanuel Lasker – D. C. Golmayo
Havana m1 1893 · Two rooks vs. rook and knight
0.0 → won
Wilhelm Steinitz – Emanuel Lasker
World Championship 05th 1894 · Rook and bishop vs. rook and knight
0.0 → won
Emanuel Lasker – Harry Nelson Pillsbury
Hastings 1895 · Queen and rook vs. queen and rook
0.0 → won
Emanuel Lasker – Mikhail Chigorin
Nuremberg 1896 · Queen and knight vs. queen and knight
0.0 → won
Emanuel Lasker – Emanuel Schiffers
Nuremberg 1896 · Rook and bishop vs. rook and knight
0.0 → won
Emanuel Lasker – Dawid Janowski
London 1899 · Rook and knight vs. bishop and knight
0.0 → won
Emanuel Lasker – Bobrov
Moscow sim 1899 · Two rooks vs. two rooks
0.0 → won
Jackson Showalter – Emanuel Lasker
London 1899 · Rook and bishop vs. rook and knight
0.0 → won
Walter Penn Shipley – Emanuel Lasker
USA tour sim 1902 · Queen, rook and bishop vs. queen
0.0 → won
Emanuel Lasker – NN
USA tour sim 1902 · Rook and bishop vs. rook and knight
17 endgames Emanuel Lasker held or won although Stockfish saw a disadvantage of at least one and a half pawns at the start. The 12 with the worst value.
−9.09 → drawn
Emanuel Lasker – J. H. Sweeney
USA tour sim 1893 · Queen and knight vs. rook and knight
−7.03 → drawn
Emanuel Lasker – Samuel Lipschuetz
USA tour sim 1901 · Queen and rook vs. queen and knight
−5.86 → drawn
Emanuel Lasker – Lukenbach
New York sim 1892 · Two rooks vs. rook and knight
−5.37 → drawn
Emanuel Lasker – Joseph Henry Blackburne
London m 1892 · Queen and rook vs. queen and knight
−4.81 → drawn
Emanuel Lasker – William Harold Hughes
Philadelphia sim 1907 · Rook and bishop vs. rook and knight
−4.78 → drawn
Julius Finn – Emanuel Lasker
USA tour sim 1901 · Rook and bishop vs. rook and bishop
−4.06 → drawn
Joseph Henry Blackburne – Emanuel Lasker
London m 1892 · Queen and rook vs. rook and bishop
−3.95 → drawn
Emanuel Lasker – R. Sauter
Budapest sim 1900 · Two rooks vs. rook and bishop
−3.84 → drawn
Emanuel Lasker – Rudolf Raubitschek
Trenton Falls 1906 · Rook and bishop vs. rook and bishop
−3.62 → drawn
Ossip Bernstein – Emanuel Lasker
St Petersburg 1909 · Queen and rook vs. queen and rook
−3.32 → drawn
Emanuel Lasker – Georgy Lisitsin
Moscow 1935 · Queen and knight vs. queen and knight
−2.84 → drawn
Rudolf Spielmann – Emanuel Lasker
Moscow 1935 · Rook and bishop vs. rook and knight
15 endgames Emanuel Lasker began at least one and a half pawns up – and did not win. That belongs to it too: the 12 with the highest value.
+8.99 → drawn
Emanuel Lasker – J. L. Sherman
USA sim 1926 · Queen and rook vs. queen and rook
+6.79 → lost
Emanuel Lasker – R. J. Loman
USA tour sim 1903 · Queen and rook vs. queen and rook
+6.47 → drawn
Emanuel Lasker – NN
GBR tour sim 1900 · Queen and knight vs. two knights
+6.45 → drawn
John Finan Barry – Emanuel Lasker
New York sim 1904 · Two rooks vs. rook and bishop
+6.32 → drawn
Emanuel Lasker – Jacques Mieses
Leipzig m 8990 1889 · Queen and rook vs. rook and knight
+5.84 → drawn
Carl Schlechter – Emanuel Lasker
St Petersburg 1909 · Rook and bishop vs. rook and bishop
+5.42 → drawn
Emanuel Lasker – Henry Bird
Liverpool m 1890 · Rook and knight vs. rook and knight
+4.51 → drawn
Julio Lynch – Emanuel Lasker
Buenos Aires sim 1910 · Two rooks vs. rook and knight
+3.76 → drawn
Emanuel Lasker – Walter Penn Shipley
New York sim 1911 · Two rooks vs. two rooks
+3.14 → lost
Emanuel Lasker – Hanni
SUI tour sim 1898 · Queen and rook vs. queen and knight
+3.03 → drawn
Emanuel Lasker – Fedor Parfenovich Bohatirchuk
Moscow 1935 · Rook and bishop vs. rook and bishop
+2.43 → drawn
Ilia Abramovich Kan – Emanuel Lasker
Moscow 1936 · Rook and knight vs. rook and knight
For each of the 497 endgames Stockfish 19 evaluated the position in which the game became an endgame – at depth 24, with a time limit; a measurement that missed the depth does not count. The values are pawns from the player's side: an evaluation, not a verdict like that of the tablebase. When a game counts as an endgame is told on the page Database.
Measurements as of 14 November 2026.